Daily Newsletters

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Nike Files Lawsuit Against Puma Alleging Patent Infringement

The suit is related to purportedly unauthorized use of its Flyknit, Air and cleat assembly technologies.
Nike LunarEpic Low Flyknit 2
Nike LunarEpic Low Flyknit 2
Nike

Nike and Puma are taking their rivalry to court.

Nike filed suit against Puma for purported patent infringement in a Massachusetts federal court Thursday. The Oregon-based athleticwear giant accused Westford, Mass.-based Puma North America of multiple counts of patent infringement related to unauthorized use of its Flyknit, Air and cleat assembly technologies. Nike has asked Puma to stop using these methods, but Puma has refused to do so, according to the Swoosh.

Puma … has forgone independent innovation and is instead using Nike’s technologies without permission,” the lawsuit reads.

Nike’s Flyknit features uppers made from a single knitted material. The brand began the series in 2012 with its Flyknit Racer and the Flyknit Trainer+.

With Puma’s Ignite footwear, released in 2015, Nike alleges that its competitor violated four U.S. patents: 7,637,032, 8,266,749, 9,078,488 and 9,375,046.

Watch on FN

With respect to Nike Air technology — which relates to footwear sole structures — Nike alleges Puma violated U.S. patent 7,401,420, which was issued to the brand in 2008. The 420 patent protects footwear “having a fluid-filled bladder with a reinforcing structure.”

Nike claims a 2017 Puma sneaker, The Jamming, is in violation of this patent because it is “an article of footwear comprising: a sole structure incorporating a fluid-filled bladder and a reinforcing structure secured to the bladder.”

As for its cleat assembly technology, Nike alleges Puma is in violation of patents 6,973,746 and 9,314,065. According to the Swoosh, Puma first infringed upon these patents with the 2015 release of its evoSpeed SL FG and has continued to do so with subsequent releases.

Nike is seeking a permanent injunction against Puma and requesting that damages be rewarded.

Meanwhile, Puma does not believe it infringed upon any patents, and plans to continue production of its products.

Puma perceives that there are no patent infringements in this case. We will do everything to defend ourselves against these accusations,” corporate communications director Ulf Santjer wrote. “This is not a preliminary injunction, and the filed lawsuit will not have an impact on our current collections.”

Want more?

Kanye West Reveals Yeezy Designer Plagiarized Apparel Sketches By Former Nike Design Director

Puma Joins the Chunky-Dad-Shoe Party With On-Trend Thunder Spectra Sneakers

Kering Spins Off Puma Stake to Shareholders to Focus Solely on Luxury

Shopping with FN
Daily Headlines

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Asap Rocky, Puma, Footwear News, FN, cover, cover story, interview, FNAA, collaboration of the year, award, collaboration
Get the Latest Issue
Only $24.99 for one year!
PMC Logo
Footwear News is a part of Penske Media Corporation. © 2024 Fairchild Publishing, LLC. All Rights Reserved. FN and Footwear News are registered trademarks of Fairchild Publishing, LLC.